
TCS NQT 2025 Logical Reasoning PYQs | Must-Solve Questions & Tips for Success
TCS NQT 2025 Logical Reasoning PYQs : The TCS National Qualifier Test (NQT) is a competitive examination designed to evaluate candidates on a range of skills, including Logical Reasoning. To assist you in your preparation, we have curated a selection of 15 previous year questions (PYQs) along with their solutions. Engaging with these questions will significantly enhance your problem-solving abilities, precision, and speed, thereby improving your overall performance in the test. Continue reading to access the questions, answers, and key strategies for effective problem-solving.

15 TCS NQT 2025 Logical Reasoning PYQs – Practice with Solutions
Are you gearing up for the TCS National Qualifier Test (NQT)? The Logical Reasoning segment is essential for evaluating your problem-solving skills. To assist you in excelling in this area, we have curated 15 previous year questions (PYQs) along with their solutions.
Engaging with these questions will provide you with insights into the question patterns, difficulty levels, and effective strategies for solving them efficiently.
Ace the TCS NQT with Our Expert-Led Crash Course – Fast-Track Your Preparation for Success!
Why Should You Practice TCS NQT 2025 Logical Reasoning PYQs?
- Enhances understanding of the exam structure
- Increases speed and accuracy
- Acquaints you with frequently asked question types
- Builds confidence for the actual examination
Strategies for Solving Logical Reasoning Questions
- Quickly Identify Patterns: Many series and coding questions contain hidden patterns. Look for number sequences, letter shifts, or positional relationships.
- Use Option Elimination: Rather than solving each question from the ground up, utilize option elimination to efficiently narrow down your choices.
- Utilize Diagrams for Understanding: For topics such as blood relations, directions, and arrangements, creating a simple diagram can simplify the problem-solving process.
- Prioritize Time Management: Logical reasoning questions can be challenging. If you find yourself stuck, move on and return later rather than expending too much time.
- Practice Regularly: The more previous year questions you tackle, the better your speed and precision will become.
15 TCS NQT 2025 Logical Reasoning PYQs
Below are 15 previous year questions from the TCS NQT Logical Reasoning section. Practice and verify your responses below.
1. In a coded form, A # B means A is the paternal grandfather of B, A $ B means A is the son of B and A@B means A is the brother of B.
Which of the following equations shows that P is the father of S?
- P@Q$R#S
- P#Q@R$S
- P#Q$R@S
- P$Q#R@S
P#Q@R$S
- P#Q → P is the paternal grandfather of Q.
- Q@R → Q is the brother of R (so P is also R’s grandfather).
- R$S → R is the son of S.
Since P is R’s grandfather and R is the son of S, this means S is P’s son, making P the father of S.
2. Which term is not as per the logic followed by others in the given sequence?
BXC, EVD, FUG, ISH, JRK, MQL
- ISH
- JRK
- MQL
- BXC

The term JRK does not follow the pattern because the second letter sequence breaks the expected alternation.
3. Given below is a question followed by two statements, I and II, each containing some information. Decide which of the statement(s) is/ are sufficient to answer the question.
Among six members of the family O, P, Q, R, S and T, how many are females?
Statements:
I. Q is wife of P and mother of T. R is grandmother of O and mother of P.
II. T is granddaughter of S
- Statement I alone is sufficient
- Statement II alone is sufficient.
- Both I and II together are sufficient
- Both I and II together are not sufficient.

We still don’t know the gender of O. Since we cannot determine the total number of females in the family, both statements together are also insufficient.
4. Choose the pair similar to the following.
ITWN : LQZK
- JZFY : MWIV
- MBTX : OLQS
- IJSX : LWBJ
- FGMO : PLKE
We need to find the pattern in letter shifts:
I → L (+3)
T → Q (-3)
W → Z (+3)
N → K (-3)
So, the pattern follows: (+3, -3, +3, -3)
Option A: JZFY → MWIV
J → M (+3)
Z → W (-3)
F → I (+3)
Y → V (-3)
5. A group of three boys A, E, F and three girls B, C, D are made to sit in a row for a meeting, but they have some conditions stated under-
(i) A will occupy a seat at an extreme end.
(ii) B will sit at an extreme position and adjacent to C, who will not sit by the side of the other girl
(iii) F will sit by the side of A, but not adjacent to E.
Who will occupy the fourth seat starting from A?
- D
- E
- C
- F
Case 1: A—F—D—E—C—B
Case 2: B—C—E—D—F—A
So, starting from A in both the case E is occupying the fourth seat.
6. If ‘A+B’ means ‘A is the sister of B’, ‘A-B’ means ‘A is the mother of B’ and ‘A = B’ means ‘A is the brother of B’. Then ‘P – Q + R = S’ may mean which of the following?
I. S is the daughter of P.
II. S is the son of P.
III. P is the sister of R.
- Only I
- Only II
- Ether I or II
- Only III

I. S is the daughter of P → Possible
II. S is the son of P → Possible
III. P is the sister of R → Incorrect (P is the mother, not the sister).
Correct Answer: (c) Either I or II
7. Given below is a question followed by two statements I and II each containing some information. Decide which among them is/are sufficient to answer the question.
Working alone, how many days would Q take to do the work?
Statements:
I. P and Q can do a work together in eight days.
II. P and Q are equally efficient in doing the said work.
- Only statement I is sufficient.
- Only statement II is sufficient
- Both statements I and II together are sufficient
- Neither statement I nor II is sufficient
Statement I: P and Q together take 8 days, but individual work rates are unknown.
Statement II: P and Q are equally efficient, but no total work rate is given.
Combining both:
(P + Q) = 1/8 work per day.
Since P = Q, each does 1/16 of the work per day.
Q alone takes 16 days.
So, both statements I and II together are sufficient.
8. In the following diagram, the rectangle, the circle, the square and the triangle stand for ‘Footballer’, Women’, ‘Lawyer’ and ‘Dancer’ respectively. The numbers in different segments show the number of persons.

How many women dancers are either lawyers or footballers but not both?
- 6
- 9
- 3
- 12
Ans: 3 TCS NQT 2025 Logical Reasoning PYQs TCS NQT 2025 Logical Reasoning PYQs
9. Given below is a statement followed by two assumptions Consider the statement and decide which of the given assumption(s) is/are implicit in the statement.
Statement:
Dependence of the media on the advertisements is a threat to freedom of expression.
Assumptions:
I. A reasonably large number of advertisements shown on the media is from the government.
II. Freedom of expression does not exist.
- Only I
- I and II
- Only II
- Neither I nor II
Answer: (d) Neither I nor II TCS NQT 2025 Logical Reasoning PYQs TCS NQT 2025 Logical Reasoning PYQs TCS NQT 2025 Logical Reasoning PYQs
Assumption I is not implicit because the statement does not mention that most ads come from the government.
Assumption II is not implicit because the statement says freedom of expression is threatened, not that it does not exist.
10. P, Q, R, S and T are five friends who are also sportspersons. P and Q love to play football, Q, R and T love to play cricket; P, R and S love to play hockey; P, S and T love to play badminton and Q, R and S love to play volleyball. Who love (s) to play hockey and badminton, but do (es) NOT love to play cricket?
- P&S
- Only P
- Only T
- P,R&S
Football – P, Q
Cricket – Q, R, T
Hockey – P, R, S
Badminton – P, S , T
Volleyball – Q, R, S
So, P & S loves to play hockey and badminton, but does NOT love to play cricket.
11. The figure marked “X” which is lying on a horizontal plane with some patterns on it is folded to form a box such that the patterns/blanks appear on the faces of the box (The face values of the numbers only are to be taken into consideration, not their writing orientation). Four possible boxes A, B, C, D are given below, out of which some can be formed and some cannot be formed. Identify the boxes that can be formed.


- Only A
- A and B
- B and C
- A and D
Ans: A and D TCS NQT 2025 Logical Reasoning PYQs TCS NQT 2025 Logical Reasoning PYQs TCS NQT 2025 Logical Reasoning PYQs
12. Given below is a question followed by two statements I and II each containing some information. Decide which among them is/are sufficient to answer the question.
I am outdoor on a cloudy day. Does it mean that I am carrying an umbrella?
Statements:
I. It is raining
II. Strong wind is blowing.
- Only statement I is sufficient
- Only statement II is sufficient.
- Both statements I and II together are sufficient
- Neither statement I nor II is sufficient
Answer: (d) Neither statement I nor II is sufficient.
Statement I (It is raining) → Doesn’t guarantee that the person must carry an umbrella.
Statement II (Strong wind is blowing) → Wind alone doesn’t imply carrying an umbrella.
Even together, it’s uncertain.
13. The figure marked ‘X’ lying flat with patterns on it is folded to form a box such that the patterns, Marks show on the faces of the box. Four possible boxes A, B, C and D are given below some of which can be formed and some cannot be formed. Choose from the alternatives the boxes that can be formed.

- A and C only
- C and D only
- B and D only
- A and D only
Ans: C and D only TCS NQT 2025 Logical Reasoning PYQs TCS NQT 2025 Logical Reasoning PYQs TCS NQT 2025 Logical Reasoning PYQs
14. X and Y are walking in opposite directions. They meet each other face-to-face at 4 PM. X finds the shadow of Y to his left. In which direction was X facing while walking?
- North
- South
- East
- West
Answer: South TCS NQT 2025 Logical Reasoning PYQs TCS NQT 2025 Logical Reasoning PYQs TCS NQT 2025 Logical Reasoning PYQs
At 4 PM, the Sun is in the west, so shadows fall east.
X sees Y’s shadow to his left, meaning Y’s shadow is in the east.
For this to happen, Y must be facing north, and since they walk in opposite directions, X was facing south.
15. Two statements are followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. Assume these statements to be true, even if they seem illogical.
Statements:
A. Some cars are bats.
B. All bats are bikes.
Conclusions:
I. Some bikes are bats.
II. No bats are bikes.
- Neither conclusion I nor conclusion II follows.
- Only conclusion II follows.
- Only conclusion I follows.
- Both conclusions I and II follow.

Ans : Only conclusion I follows. TCS NQT 2025 Logical Reasoning PYQs TCS NQT 2025 Logical Reasoning PYQs TCS NQT 2025 Logical Reasoning PYQs
Conclusion
Logical reasoning hinges on pattern recognition and swift thinking. Through consistent practice and the right strategies, you can effectively tackle these questions.
Bookmark this page and continue practicing these TCS NQT Logical Reasoning PYQs for improved outcomes. Stay connected for additional study resources.
Have doubts? Feel free to leave your questions in the comments.